Electric Shock: The Curious Case of a Gas Charge for a Tesla Rental

Imagine renting a Tesla Model 3 for a leisurely weekend in Los Angeles, only to be slapped with a jaw-dropping $277.39 charge for gas upon return. Yes, you read that right – a charge for gas in an electric vehicle that famously runs on electricity. This bewildering scenario befell a Hertz Presidents Circle customer, sparking confusion and frustration in what can only be described as a surreal blend of comedy and customer service nightmare.

Details about the case

The perplexing charge was levied despite the customer having selected the ‘skip the pump and save time’ prepaid fuel option for rentals, a decision that under normal circumstances, wouldn’t make sense unless returning a gas vehicle empty. Yet, here we are, talking about an electric Tesla Model 3, which, last time anyone checked, doesn’t come with a gas tank. The absurdity of the situation is underscored by the fact that the fee imposed was even higher than what one would expect to pay for refueling a gas vehicle.

Hertz’s response to the customer’s queries added more fuel to the fire, with customer service staunchly refusing to budge on the charge. “I am unable to provide an adjustment or refund since the service was provided and contract is closed,” stated a Hertz customer service administrator, despite the undeniable fact that refueling an electric vehicle with gasoline is an impossibility. This stance, coupled with the assertion that the “service was provided,” leaves one wondering about the nature of the service in question.

The saga doesn’t stop there. The customer, who had responsibly returned the car with a 96% charge, was essentially being penalized for a service that was not only unnecessary but physically impossible. This situation highlights a glaring disconnect within Hertz’s policies, particularly when considering that the company has a specific policy for EV recharging, which would have incurred a maximum fee of $35, a far cry from the $277 charged.

What makes this tale even more intriguing is the customer’s loyalty to Hertz and the Tesla Model 3. As a Hertz Presidents Circle customer, and a fan of renting the Model 3 in California for its economical recharging costs compared to gas vehicles, the customer’s experience serves as a cautionary tale for renters everywhere. It’s a stark reminder of the potential pitfalls of relying on automated systems and policies without adequate oversight or common sense.

The incident has sparked lively discussions among car rental customers, with many sharing their own grievances and expressing disbelief at the situation. Some see it as another reason to avoid car rentals altogether, while others suggest that the power of social media might be the key to resolving such disputes. Amidst the chatter, one thing is clear: the customer’s ordeal has touched a nerve, highlighting the need for greater transparency and accountability in the car rental industry.

Despite a fortunate turn of events, Hertz has since apologized and reimbursed the erroneous fee, albeit belatedly following the story’s widespread attention. While this resolution is appreciated, it cannot erase the customer’s frustration and inconvenience. It underscores the fact that, amidst the electric vehicle revolution, some companies still lag behind in comprehending and addressing the requirements of environmentally mindful consumers. As we traverse this transformation, let us aspire for a future where renting electric vehicles is as seamless and unhindered as the serene whisper of their motors.

Related posts:
Hertz Charged Presidents Circle Member $277 For Not Filling Gas Tank On A Tesla, Won’t Remove Fees
Hertz Charges Tesla Model 3 Renter $277 Fee for Gas, Won’t Back Down [Update]
Hertz Charges Tesla Model 3 Renter $277 Fee for Gas, Won’t Back Down