Regrettable Rides: The Cars That Missed the Mark in the 1960s

The 1960s was a remarkable decade for automobiles, characterized by innovation, style, and a fevered enthusiasm for speed. However, amidst the triumphs and classics of the era, some cars fell short of expectations, proving that not every design was a home run. In this slideshow, we will take you on a journey through some of the most regrettable rides of the 1960s, exploring their intended allure versus their actual performance.

1. **MG VA (1937)**: While technically predating the 1960s, the MG VA is an example of how enthusiasm can sometimes cloud judgment. With a meager 54bhp from its 1.5-litre engine, it failed to deliver the sporty performance that MG fans desired. But let’s not dismiss it entirely. The VA was celebrated for its smooth handling and braking capabilities, making it a somewhat graceful ride despite its lacking power.

2. **Chevrolet Corvette (1953)**: The original Corvette has evolved into an icon of American muscle, yet its debut was met with mixed reviews. The first model was powered by a lackluster straight-six engine, yielding just 148bhp. It wasn’t until the introduction of the small-block V8 two years later that the Corvette began to captivate enthusiasts. Initially, some might argue the car missed the mark, but its later versions certainly redeemed it.

3. **Mercedes-Benz 190SL (1955)**: Mercedes-Benz marketed the 190SL as a sporty GT, but with a 1.9-litre engine producing under half the horsepower of its sibling, the 300SL, it left performance enthusiasts wanting more. Despite this, the 190SL carved out a niche for itself as an elegant and accessible option, with over 25,000 units sold—proving that beauty can outshine sheer power.

4. **Porsche 912 (1965)**: The Porsche 912 was introduced as a cheaper alternative to the 911, but its underpowered 1.6-litre engine left many yearning for the thrilling flat-six of its more illustrious sibling. However, the 912 became immensely popular due to its affordability and classic Porsche aesthetic, showing that sometimes, compromise can lead to success.

5. **De Tomaso Mangusta (1967)**: The Mangusta was a stunning V8 sports car that promised excitement but was plagued by handling issues. Its engineers struggled with weight distribution and chassis rigidity, leading to a driving experience that was less than exhilarating. Yet, it paved the way for the more successful Pantera, proving that even missteps can lead to future triumphs.

6. **MGC (1967)**: The MGC aimed to boost the performance of the beloved MGB, but its heavier engine dramatically compromised handling. This resulted in a model that did not live up to the MGB’s sporty reputation. However, enthusiasts appreciate the MGC for its ambition, and many still seek them out for restoration projects.

7. **Opel GT (1968)**: Often compared to the Corvette, the Opel GT’s design was enchanting, but its performance was underwhelming with a 1.1-litre engine. Despite its beauty, this model catered more to style than to speed, yet it remains a beloved classic among collectors.

8. **Triumph TR250 (1968)**: The TR250 was essentially a downgraded TR5, with an engine that made it significantly less powerful. Despite the disappointing figures, it found favor among buyers, illustrating that sometimes, a car’s appeal goes beyond raw performance numbers.

9. **Ford Capri (1969)**: Touted as the ‘car you always promised yourself’, the Capri came with various engine options, yet some of the weaker configurations left drivers unenthused. The allure of its design, however, kept it popular, especially in the face of more powerful competitors.

10. **Matra Bagheera (1973)**: Known for its quirky three-seat layout, the Matra Bagheera was visually striking, but underwhelmed with a modest engine outcome. While it failed to make waves in performance, its design still garners interest from enthusiasts today.

11. **Ford Mustang II (1974)**: The Mustang II was a significant departure from the original Mustang’s performance-oriented roots. This version was criticized for its lack of power and uninspiring design. The introduction of a 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine was seen as a betrayal by enthusiastic fans of the original pony car. Despite its lower performance, the Mustang II still has a loyal following due to its styling.

12. **Chevrolet Vega (1971)**: Hailed as a compact car with innovative design and a lightweight body, the Vega quickly became known for its numerous quality issues. The introduction of a 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine offered decent performance, but many early models suffered from rust problems and engine failures, tarnishing its reputation. Despite the shortcomings, the Vega’s unique styling and affordability earned it a place in the hearts of many American drivers.

13. **AMC Pacer (1975)**: The AMC Pacer stood out for its unusual design, featuring a wide body and large glass area. However, its performance was lackluster, powered by a modest 3.8-liter six-cylinder engine. Critics often labeled it as underwhelming, with many viewing it as a quirky failure in automotive design. But, its unique aesthetic and cultural significance in films have made it a nostalgic favorite among collectors today.

14. **Dodge Monaco (1977)**: The Dodge Monaco was aimed at the police market but quickly became known for its lack of performance and uninspired driving dynamics. The 5.2-liter V8 engine offered ample power, but many felt it couldn’t keep up with the sleek looks of the car. The Monaco is often remembered not for its speed but for its role in the iconic television show, “The Blues Brothers,” which has solidified its place in pop culture.

15. **Ford Pinto (1971)**: The Pinto is often remembered for its controversial safety issues, particularly its flammable fuel tank design. While it was marketed as an affordable, compact car, the safety concerns overshadowed its practicality. Nevertheless, the Pinto was a commercial success for Ford, showcasing that sometimes practicality and price can outweigh performance and safety.

16. **Chrysler Cordoba (1975)**: With its luxurious interior and unique styling, the Chrysler Cordoba aimed to capture the hearts of luxury-seeking consumers. Unfortunately, the performance was uninspiring, with its 5.2-liter engine failing to impress driving enthusiasts. However, it gained a sort of cult status thanks to its memorable advertisements featuring actor Ricardo Montalbán, highlighting the allure of luxury over performance.

17. **Fiat Multipla (1998)**: Known for its unconventional looks and oddly shaped body, the Fiat Multipla generated a lot of mixed feelings. While it provided ample space and comfort for families, it was frequently criticized for its styling. Time has been kinder to the Multipla, as collectors now appreciate its quirky design and the practicality it offered.

As we reflect on these cars that missed the mark, we realize that each vehicle, despite its flaws, contributed to the broader narrative of automotive evolution. They remind us that creativity and ambition can lead to spectacular misfires, but they also pave the way for innovation and improvement in future designs.

Related posts:
The (21) Most Popular 1960s Cars
Most Quintessential Cars of the 1960s
Muscle Cars of the ‘60s and ‘70s Part II: The Ugly